News
Jorie Les wins undue influence summary trial
AMLC's Jorie Les obtained judgment in an undue influence claim arising out of a predatory relationship…
AMLC's Jorie Les obtained judgment in an undue influence claim arising out of a predatory relationship.
The parties met when the plaintiff was 77 and the defendant was 62. The plaintiff was elderly and vulnerable. Over the course of their seven-year relationship, the defendant isolated the plaintiff from her friends and family and gained control over all aspects of the plaintiff's life. In addition to exhausting the plaintiff's financial resources, the defendant deceived her into adding him on title to her property as a joint tenant.
Following a two-day summary trial in which Jorie presented extensive affidavit evidence from the plaintiff's family, friends, and neighbors, the court granted judgment from the bench returning title to the property to the plaintiff alone. Jorie was also successful in obtaining an order for punitive damages of $50,000.
To read the decision, visit 2024 BCSC 1745. For more information on Allen / McMillan's real estate litigation and estate litigation practices, please contact Jorie at jorie@amlc.ca.
Congratulations to AMLC for ranking in the Chambers Canada Legal Guide under Litigation - General Commercial: Highly Regarded!
This is the first year we received recognition from Chambers Canada. Greg was also ranked for his work in Litigation: General Commercial…
This is the first year we received recognition from Chambers Canada. Greg was also ranked for his work in Litigation: General Commercial.
Chambers Canada differentiates the best legal talent across Canada using an in-depth market analysis and comprehensive independent research. It is known for its accuracy, depth, and quality rankings.
We are grateful for this recognition and to be included on a list of incredible lawyers and firms. AMLC extends our congratulations to the others that were ranked this year!
Meet Danielle, our new Associate
AMLC is pleased to announce that Danielle Wierenga has joined the firm as an associate…
AMLC is pleased to announce that Danielle Wierenga has joined the firm as an associate.
Danielle was called to the bar on September 11, 2024. During her articles, she gained experience in civil and commercial litigation, including contractual disputes, corporate and administrative law.
Danielle has an undergrad from UBC with a major in international relations and completed her law degree at Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie. She also has a specialization certificate in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law from Schulich.
We are excited to have Danielle as a member of the team!
AMLC hosted a Confections and Career Connections event with Peter A. Allard School of Law
The AMLC team had the pleasure of hosting a “Confections and Career Connections” event with Peter A. Allard School of Law...
The AMLC team had the pleasure of hosting a “Confections and Career Connections” event with Peter A. Allard School of Law last Thursday! Wes, Nojan, and Mia had a great time at Allard Hall serving up some pie and chatting with students about a career in law. Thanks to all the students who came out!
Greg Allen and Wes McMillan will be presenting at CLEBC’s “How to be a Great Litigation Junior”
On September 20, 2024, Greg Allen and Wes McMillan will be speaking on the “How to Be a Great Litigation Junior” panel...
On September 20, 2024, Greg Allen and Wes McMillan will be speaking on the “How to Be a Great Litigation Junior” panel to share their experiences as senior counsel / founding partners of AMLC and reflect on what they wish they knew as junior lawyers. This will be the 4th edition of this program, and we are proud to be a part of a course that provides junior lawyers and the legal community with skills and strategies that will help with professional growth, tips on how to build strong connections and mentorship relationships with senior counsel, and the opportunity to obtain practice advice from industry leaders.
Learn more about the event and register at How to Be a Great Litigation Junior 2024 | CLE BC Online Store.
AMLC lawyers to represent interveners in religious freedom case
AMLC lawyers John Trueman and Chloe Trudel will represent the British Columbia Humanist Association in an important appeal...
AMLC lawyers John Trueman and Chloe Trudel will represent the British Columbia Humanist Association in an important appeal to help define the boundary between privacy rights and religious freedom.
On June 12, 2024, Court of Appeal Justice Winteringham granted leave to intervene to the BC Humanists and another organization, the Association for Reformed Political Action. In her reasons, Justice Winteringham noted that “both the BCHA and the ARPA have experience and expertise, as well as a unique perspective, which will be of benefit to the division hearing the appeal.”
The appeal itself, which will be heard on October 29, 2024, involves a challenge by certain religious organizations and individuals to the constitutionality of the Personal Information Protection Act, the BC law that governs how private sector organizations collect, use, and disclose personal information. The BC Humanists will argue, among other things, that religious freedom should not become a vehicle to subvert the privacy rights of individuals, including people who have chosen to leave organized religion. AMLC lawyer Wes McMillan represented the BC Humanists in the trial court.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allows interventions sparingly. Any proposed intervenor must offer a “unique and different perspective that will assist the Court in the resolution of the issues” without seeking to “expand the scope of the appeal by raising issues not raised by the parties.”
Allen / McMillan Litigation Counsel’s award-winning pro bono practice often includes public interest interventions for organizations such as the BC Humanists, who bring important perspectives to the law but have limited resources. AMLC lawyers have previously represented the BC Humanists at the BC Human Rights Tribunal, the BC Supreme Court and, on two occasions, at the Supreme Court of Canada.
To read the Court of Appeal’s reasons on the application to intervene, visit 2024 BCCA 291.